GRE作文得分點主要在哪兒?我們一起來看看吧，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。

GRE作文得分點主要在哪兒

1. 邏輯混亂。

2.過于主觀。

3.中式思維/表達。

4.過分注重用詞。

具體分析：

一、邏輯問題：

大體上來說，同學們的邏輯問題是最多的。邏輯問題有三種，通篇邏輯，段落之間，段落之中。

其實這可能和我們高中初中的英語教育有關系，大家都很喜歡一條一條擺原因。Firstly, secondly...然后后面至于這個ly后面是什么就不管了，一頓胡扯。也不管這段落與段落之間的銜接是否自然，反正都有什么ly給打頭陣。

事實上，中西方的思維總是存在差異，很多時候看管老師們都不懂考生在說什么。考官很困惑，這個例子和這個有關系嗎?為什么前面在說A，后面突然B了?

二、整體觀念：

和結論什么關系?要記住一點，GRE作文文章是一個整體，你的開篇結尾和中部內容都是應該有關聯的。也就是說，在開頭提到的，文中應該有展開，同時在結尾有總結。中文里不也要求行文流暢么，這至少得要求邏輯是通順的。

三、能力要求：

很多同學都很喜歡寫中立觀點“A不錯，但不夠好”，這雖然看起來很客觀，但實際上這種GRE作文對邏輯的要求非常高，要怎樣去組織語言，組織相應的論據論點，非常考驗人。

有同學想說A事件要瑕疵互見，但是寫著寫著就亂七八糟，東一塊西一塊，不知道在講點什么了。更有厲害的索性冗長的2000來詞，講了個空話。所以建議剛上手的同學，還是選擇一邊倒，站定腳跟不放松。即便是真的要寫中立觀點，實際上也都在A和B之間有所偏好。

四、內容空洞：

此外，現在很多人會要求練writing的時候先寫提綱。于是同學們們就只寫一個觀點，然后后面的例子亂用，或者根本沒有弄清楚什么是例子。事實上，這種展開，可以是實例，也可以是虛擬的假設。實例中往往分自己的經驗和他人的經驗。那么怎樣的例子有說服力呢?

一般來說是：名人名事(知名度大)> 眾人眾事(樣本大)>自己經歷(體會深)>他人經歷。假設往往不夠有說服力，因為很難涉及到每一個變量。但是假設在有的時候可以行得通，就是在很難說清楚步驟和因果關系的時候，用一個假設場景來推導會讓文章變得淺顯易懂。

所以建議，在剛開始上手寫GRE作文的時候，先不要給自己30分鐘的壓力，先列出提綱(10分鐘)，再用30分鐘去寫，看能寫多少。

五、選材準確：

記住你的舉例一定要死死扣住你的GRE作文觀點，不要是和觀點打擦邊球的。比如我改過之前一個小朋友的文章，她的大觀點是電腦對學生來說是有益的，小觀點是，可以查到很多資料，然后例子是可以用google查到很多資料，很快捷。

ok，乍一看這個沒有問題。但是實際上問題大了，用goole查到很多資料，是因為電腦還是internet?這很容易就偏題了，變成internet 對學生來說是有益的。例子一定要從論點出發，再回到論點。不要將你的論點發散，后果很可能就是越寫越跑題。所以每次寫好一篇文章，都看看，論據里的key words是不是和論點里的key words 一樣，論點里的key words又是不是和題目里的key words一樣。你的key words 可以比大題里的key words更加narrow，但是千萬不要更加廣泛。

邏輯錯誤是GRE作文段落中邏輯比較容易錯的。一般是對接續詞的運用。如However, thus, therefore，他們決定了上下文之間的關系，但是很多讀起來就很奇怪，兩者完全不是轉折的關系，用了however，就會讓人覺得有些無厘頭。或者就是上下文之間完全沒有邏輯聯系，就是兩個單句湊在了一起。還是這句話，一篇文章和流水似的，不能斷。中間斷了那就不叫好文章了。即使前一句與有一句沒有接續詞，它們在邏輯上也是要能承接的。想要去的GRE寫作滿分，則一定要在邏輯上完美無缺。

GRE issue寫作優秀實例：多媒體教育

題目：

Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.

盡管諸如電視、電腦和互聯網這樣的發明似乎給學校教育提供了進步的手段，但是所有這些技術往往也是在偏離真正的學習。

正文：

Nowadays there is a growing concern about the role that innovations have played in the field of learning. While most people think that innovations benefit learning process in various ways, different opinions arise that these technology advancements actually distract students from real learning. On balance, according to my personal observation,whether innovations can be beneficial or detrimental to real learning depends on the students and the teachers, not on these innovations themselves.

To begin with, technological innovations do help teaching and learning in various ways.With the aid of these technologies, the process of teaching and learning can be shorter and easier than before. For instance, if a student want certain published papers of an academic discipline, he/she may look through considerable catalogs to find the ones he/she needs. However, with the help of Internet innovation, at present most of these papers are published online. Consequently, to find certain paper the procedure is much easier and shorter, the students just type the key words and other information of the paper, and then the system will search the database, and the papers are there waiting for them. As this new approach can save a lot of time for the students, he/she could have more time reading the papers and absorbing the knowledge rather than checking and looking for the papers that could be a waste of his/her time. This example aptly illustrates how technology advancement benefited the students and their learning process.

Secondly, while innovations can help learning in various ways, it is more important that the central role of the pursuit for knowledge and wisdoms are maintained. What real matters is not the approach but the purpose of learning. In India, where modern technologies are less applied to the learning process than in the US and other developed countries, still a lot of distinguished students achieved their academic goal with their hard work and desires to knowledge. In the US, where the software engineering students are given the most advanced facilities and apparatus for their learning and research, however, it is wildly accepted that they are far less outstanding compared to the Indian students of software, who may share computers in groups. From this comparison we can see that the real and core push of learning is the desire for knowledge, not the help of innovations.

In addition, if not guided properly, the technology advancement might inhibit learning.In other words, innovation can distract the students from real learning than helping them. It is obvious that a computer can help students of science to calculate mathematical equations but can also be used for recreation such as net surfing or computer games. It is highly possible that these students can spend more time and energy on recreations rather than learning when using a computer. Thus, learning is inhibited. Under this circumstance, guidance and restrictions are needed to ensure the right use of innovations for learning, or the consequence may be on the contrary to the students and teachers' desire.

To conclude, technological innovations are beneficial to learning in many ways, but when using these technologies, one should not forget the real purpose of learning and remember not to be distracted for other usages of these innovations that are irrelevant or detrimental to learning. On balance, innovation here serves as a double-edges sword, and its right use is dependent on the students and the teachers.

GRE issue寫作優秀實例：忠誠

題目：

Most people are taught that loyalty is a virtue. But loyalty-whether to one's friends, to one's school or place of employment, or to any institution-is all too often a destructive rather than a positive force.

大多數人被告知忠誠是一種美德。但是無論是對朋友、對學校、對單位還是對任何機構，忠誠時常都是弊大于利的。

正文：

I disagree with the author for he has confused the faithfulness with the misguided or overextended loyalty. In fact, loyalty does be a cherished virtue that should be given enough emphasis.

Loyalty, a kind of lasting persistence and its precondition is that the subject of fidelity is worthy of such strong emotion. In each society, loyalty is a indispensable and vital part of the system of morality. No matter in schools, at home or at work, first midst and last, people accept a similar education that as an individual, he or she should first have a sense of ligeance, that is work for the whole. Of course, the subjects of loyalty are various including scientific theory, friends, family, schools, places of employment and the nation. A vivid example can lend support to the statement is the heroical astronomer - Bronow, who advanced Copernicus' theory that the earth and other planets revolve around the sun, enraged the Roma church that held the Ptolemaic system of astronomy and was burnt to death just because he refused to give up his scientific theory. It is the lasting loyalty toward truth that lead Bronow to sacrifice himself. And people all respect such duteous spirit. However, without loyalty, the morality of a society will deteriorate into apathy desert and everyone just lives for him /herself, that is to say, no one is willing to pay loyalty to the whole, then finally the human civilization will fall apart.

However, on the other hand, the fidelity should not be confused with misguided or overextended loyalty and the latter is all too often a destructive rather than a positive force. People all hold that mutual loyalty between friends is the basis of lasting friendship. But people should also realize that true loyalty and authentic responsibility for a friend are not only always believing him or her unconditionally but also persuading, helping and even impeaching him or her when him or her has committed serious mistakes or even crimes. Of course, when facing up to such painful dilemma, each one will hesitate because he or she is afraid of being censured to betray his or her friend and some one may choose to keep slient in order to insist of the so-called loyalty.

In fact, such behavior may prevent his or her friend from taking right actions. The same to a school, a family, a company even the nation, when the subject that people once string along with no longer deserves loyalty, people should resolutely choose to be loyal to the truth, the justice and the humanity. That calls for people are always alert to what they think right and what they think wrong, via doing so, people can change their mind for right choice on time.

To sum up, people should insist on true loyalty, and always avoid being the victim of the misguided or overextended loyalty. In the world, there is nothing that can be always absolutely right or wrong and changing happens all the time. So people should always hold deep insight to discern what deserves their loyalty and what does not.

GRE作文得分點主要在哪兒相關文章：

1.托福寫作的6個注意內容